Cheating on SBAs? CXC gets tough!

Cheating on SBAs has been one of my pet peeves over the years. In their haste to submit their projects, students have tried every trick in the book to gain an advantage. There is no point in detailing their cheating strategies here. Suffice it to say, at one point,  I once considered challenging the validity of the SBA component  of CXC exams.

I am sure that CXC has been aware of the problem over the years. They have now decided to get tough with the culprits. Apparently, with the growth of ICT, cheating has become even more widespread and more complicated.

The following was recently reported on the CXC website as concerns emerging from a meeting of officers of the Council.

Problems in SBAs

An issue of major concern which was brought to the fore was plagiarism as it related to School-Based Assessment projects, also called SBAs. In a move to clamp down on dishonesty both on the part of teachers and students Giles said CXC would be toughening its stance and ensuring work was screened in a more meticulous manner. One school, in which the country was not identified, submitted an SBA where it was later discovered that the teacher “repackaged” the project. That teacher, she said, was recommended by CXC to be suspended and all the students in that particular class were not awarded any marks.

Another problem relating to SBAs was that in some cases the projects were not being submitted by students. The result of which led to the student not being graded for the subject. According to The Caribbean Examiner, a publication of CXC, for October 2011 it cited that reported cases of fraud in the 2011 examinations included:

• Collusion in the examination room;

• collusion on SBAs;

• impersonation;

• forged signature;

• taking notes into the examination room and;

• submission of identical practical reports;

• Submission of fabricated SBA marks;

• Submission of SBA projects previously submitted by past students.

It is interesting to note that CXC has found some teachers to be culpable. However, I choose not to comment on that at this time. I would only say that teachers should know that they DO NOT help our young people when the collude with them to cheat on SBAs.

Advertisements

One response

  1. Laziness and lack of creativity is the cause for teachers behaving like this. I cannot see why a teacher will want to cheat for a student. Come on teachers help the children to improve their academic standards,not too become cheaters. That is why some of them have 10 subjects but cannot think for themselves.You are the cause of this nonsense!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: